[U-Boot] [PATCH] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot at aribaud.net]
> Sent: 05 July 2012 16:32
> To: Gerlando Falauto
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Marek Vasut; Longchamp, Valentin; Brunck,
> Holger; Prafulla Wadaskar
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] kirkwood: implement kw_sdram_bs_set()
> 
> Hi Gerlando,
> 
> On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:57:44 +0200, Gerlando Falauto
> <gerlando.falauto at keymile.com> wrote:
> > Hi Albert,
> >
> > On 07/05/2012 12:39 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > Hi Gerlando,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:37:54 +0200, Gerlando Falauto
> > > <gerlando.falauto at keymile.com>  wrote:
> > >> Some boards might be equipped with different SDRAM
> configurations.
> > >> When that is the case, CPU CS Window Size Register (CS[0]n Size)
> > >> should be set to the biggest value through board.cfg file; then
> its
> > >> value can be fixed at runtime according to the detected SDRAM
> size.
> > >>
> > >> Therefore, implement kw_sdram_bs_set(), to be called for instance
> > >> within board_early_init_f().
> > >>
> > [...]
> > >
> > > I don't like isolated patches that seem to create dead code. I
> know
> > > here it is not the goal, of course; so why not submit a two-patch
> > > series, providing both the new code *and* a use for it?
> >
> > You're absolutely right.
> > But mine was more of an interruption/suggestion throughout the
> > discussion between Marek and Prafulla... I just didn't want to take
> > credit for someone else's code, or create any conflicts with it.
> 
> Understood. Next time, please just add [RFC] in the subject, so that
> the patch is not considered for inclusion.
> 
> > I figured it might be quicker (and more fair) that way, perhaps with
> > Marek resubmitting it within his own series, or SoB-ing it, because
> > in fact mine is just a refactoring of his idea...
> > I can of course submit the two-patch series for our boards, if
> that's
> > OK with Marek.
> 
> That's to be sorted between Marek and you. :)

Hi Gerlando
Marek's board support for TK71 is pulled in, may be this patch will be useful for his next board support (if any).

BTW: you can always submit it as a part of patch series for your boards.

Regards...
Prafulla . . .