[U-Boot] Notes from the U-Boot BOF Meeting in Geneva 2012/07/12

[Tom Rini]

On 07/23/2012 10:17 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 03:27:30AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Dear Tom Rini,
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:21:40AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>> And Jenkins... well, we have been using this for some time internally
>>>>> to run test builds for U-Boot.  I can tell you a thing or two about
>>>>> it, and Marek has his own story to tell about his experiences when he
>>>>> added to the build matrix.
>>>>>
>>>>> As is, we try hard to get rid of Jenkins, because it does not scale
>>>>> well to the type of builds we want to be able to do.  Marek even
>>>>> started setting up his own test build framework...
>>>>
>>>> I told Marek on IRC that I don't understand this, given a lot of the
>>>> things I've made Jenkins do before and that at the end of the day it's
>>>> $whatever-pass/fail-logic
>>>
>>> Not really, what about the warning-logic ? Aka. I actually need jenkins
>>> to do tristate results. How, I didn't figure out.
>>
>> Yes, you can have the build go "yellow" for warnings.
>
> How?

Post build stuff and promoted builds.  I'm hopeful once I get a few 
patch series polished up and posted for v2012.11 I can go back and give 
my Jenkins instance some more attention.

>>>> on top of a bash script to do the building and
>>>> testing.
>>>
>>> So in the end, jenkins is just an executor, bringing in pile of java
>>> overhead and possible random breakage. I use MAKEALL in my script, which
>>> does exactly what I need ... and even tests MAKEALL ;-)
>>
>> Yes, you're writing your own overhead and dealing with bugs in that
>> rather than using an existing project :)
>
> Well, jenkins just crashed so badly I didn't manage to get it back in a working
> state, you know ...

Never had that happen, sorry :)

-- 
Tom