[U-Boot] RFC - PatchTrack Specification (revised)

[Graeme Russ]

Hi Marek,

For future reference, please comment against:

Take a look at http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ToolsPatchTracking

On 07/29/2012 01:15 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
> 
> You might want to actually create an mbox of all these stacked patches so people 
> can download and apply them and rebase their patches on top of them.

Under 'Web Interface':

"Download a patch set of all patches meeting a specific criteria (pass all
stand-alone and inter-dependent tests and have been acked for example)"

This could be an mbox file or an archive (.tgz) of patches

>> Operation Sequence - Revised version of existing patch

[snip]

> 
> Yes? Maybe this should be applied at the place where the old patch was, rather 
> than on top.

Revised version of existing patch
 - Remove existing patch from patch stack
 - Insert new patch into patch stack at same location as the removed patch
 - Run each configured static test against the patch
 - Run each configured dynamic test against the patch
 - Record the results of the static and dynamic tests against the patch

So yes, in place of the existing patch

> Why not make committed like ... lavender or something </jab> ? :)

:P

> 
> [...]
> The rest sounds quite cool.

Good :)

Regards,

Graeme