[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/5] mxs: prefix register acessor macros with 'mxs' prefix

[Otavio Salvador]

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de> wrote:
> Personally I prefer that the function names are the same and the
> implementation itself of the function hides the SOC details. In this
> way, we provide the same interface API to the user (=the board
> maintainer) and to the drivers that are surely shared between the MX28
> and MX23.

Sure but the accessing structure is the same for MX233 and MX28 so
makes sense to have it with SOC name. If we have some divertion here a
ifdef will be need to handle.

I also think we ought to try to split function implementation when it
diverts much (as code of spl_mem_init does) to make it easy to follow
and maintain but this is not done yet.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br