[U-Boot] [PATCH] Kirkwood: Add support for Ka-Ro TK71
Valentin Longchamp
valentin.longchamp at keymile.com
Mon Jun 4 17:36:30 CEST 2012
Hi Marek and Prafulla,
On 06/01/2012 03:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
>>> Sent: 31 May 2012 16:37
>>> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
>>> Cc: Marek Vasut; Prafulla Wadaskar; Wolfgang Denk
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Kirkwood: Add support for Ka-Ro TK71
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>>> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla at marvell.com>
>>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> board/karo/tk71/Makefile | 45 ++++++++++
>>> board/karo/tk71/kwbimage-256.cfg | 174
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> board/karo/tk71/kwbimage-512.cfg | 174
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> Dear Marek
>> Just for DRAM size change do not add one more cfg file, configure by
>> default 256MB of RAM in default kwbimg.cfg file and in function
>> board_early_init_f() tune it to 512 for your other board version.
>
> There's only one single bit flipped between those two kwb configs. Do you think
> it'd work if we just configured the system for 512MB RAM and ran get_ram_size()
> to see if it has only 256MB? That'd eliminate two board entries for this tk71.
>
I would like to have your advice on this as well Prafulla.
We have tested this on km_arm (we will have the same boards with 1/2 the RAM
size) and with the above get_ram_size() it works as expected.
We still should, however, at some point (board_early_init_f() is a good
candidate) then reduce the corresponding RAM CS size (reg @1504 for CS0 so that
the window is the same size as what was detected by get_ram_size). What do you
guys think ?
Valentin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list