[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] imx: Use a clear identification of an unidentified CPU type

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Sun Jun 17 18:03:28 CEST 2012


Dear Otavio Salvador,

> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de> wrote:
> >> -             return "unknown";
> >> +             return "<unidentified>";
> > 
> > Taste ist taste... but why <unidentified> is better that unknown ?
> 
> For me it gives a visual indication that we didn't meant to support a
> i.MXunknown processor ;-) i.MX<unidentified> make it easy to spot
> this.
> 
> But really, I don't mind it being included or not. I did it because
> Marek has comment about it when looking at my initial mx23 patches.

And I like it more, it looks less like a typo.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list