[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] microblaze: avoid compile error on systems without cfi flash
Stephan Linz
linz at li-pro.net
Mon Jun 25 19:08:57 CEST 2012
Am Montag, den 25.06.2012, 06:55 +0200 schrieb Michal Simek:
> On 06/21/2012 09:42 PM, Stephan Linz wrote:
> > Use XILINX_FLASH_START to set/unset FLASH and RAMENV.
> >
> > Error was:
> > board.c: In function 'board_init':
> > board.c:134: error: 'XILINX_FLASH_START' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > board.c:134: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > board.c:134: error: for each function it appears in.)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Linz<linz at li-pro.net>
> > ---
> > include/configs/microblaze-generic.h | 14 +++++++++-----
> > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/configs/microblaze-generic.h b/include/configs/microblaze-generic.h
> > index 295d123..2ef7d62 100644
> > --- a/include/configs/microblaze-generic.h
> > +++ b/include/configs/microblaze-generic.h
> > @@ -31,6 +31,15 @@
> > #define CONFIG_MICROBLAZE 1
> > #define MICROBLAZE_V5 1
> >
> > +/* linear flash memory */
> > +#ifdef XILINX_FLASH_START
> > +#define FLASH
> > +#undef RAMENV /* hold environment in flash */
> > +#else
> > +#undef FLASH
> > +#define RAMENV /* hold environment in RAM */
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /* uart */
> > #ifdef XILINX_UARTLITE_BASEADDR
> > # define CONFIG_XILINX_UARTLITE
> > @@ -164,9 +173,6 @@
> > /* stack */
> > #define CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_OFFSET CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_BASE
> >
> > -/*#define RAMENV */
> > -#define FLASH
> > -
> > #ifdef FLASH
> > # define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE XILINX_FLASH_START
> > # define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_SIZE XILINX_FLASH_SIZE
> > @@ -200,8 +206,6 @@
> > # define CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE 1
> > # define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE 0x1000
> > # define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR (CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE - CONFIG_ENV_SIZE)
> > -/* hardware flash protection */
> > -# define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_PROTECTION
>
> What's wrong with hardware flash protection?
Nothing, but it will defined twice. One time in line 182 and one time in
that line 204. I think the last one is wrong, because that define is
outside the Flash configuration context, or not?
Sorry, I should split the patch. Should I do this?
br,
Stephan
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list