[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/6] mcx: Disable DCACHE since USB EHCI is enabled

[Tom Rini]

On 06/28/2012 03:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
> 
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:01:58AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Dear Tom Rini,
>>>
>>>> On 06/28/2012 07:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> Dear Ilya Yanok,
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Marek,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 28.06.2012 02:48, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sorry for missing this discussion. I think compile-time disabling
>>>>>>>> of the cache is too brutal.
>>>>>>>> ehci-hcd cache handling is broken anyway: doing unaligned
>>>>>>>> flushes/invalidates is a bug, and we know for sure that upper
>>>>>>>> layers don't care about alignment (and I bet ehci-hcd does this
>>>>>>>> even for its internal buffers). So what's the point in all this
>>>>>>>> cache handling in ehci-hcd? It's not going to work anyway and
>>>>>>>> just produces problems. So I suggest to just disable all this
>>>>>>>> stuff until generic code will be fixed. Alternatively we can do
>>>>>>>> bounce-buffering inside driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We should rather introduce generic bounce buffer. But the upper
>>>>>>> layers are getting fixed recently so we should be getting there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really? Don't forget my old patch [1] then ;)
>>>>>> Still I think we should rip off all the cache stuff from ehci-hcd
>>>>>> until all patches for upper layers are included. Again, this stuff
>>>>>> doesn't do proper things now anyway and USB won't work with dcache
>>>>>> enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you tested? I enabled dcache on m28 and tried asix ethernet
>>>>> (needed a patch) and loading from ext2 and vfat (worked).
>>>>
>>>> So then we have more places that accidentially aligned to 32bytes since
>>>> this does not work on TI parts which require 64byte alignment.
>>>
>>> Oh, this is very good it's broken. People actually started whining. Now
>>> we have to wait until they start identifying the problematic places and
>>> fixing them.
>>
>> Uh-hunh.  So I guess for v2012.07 we'll build-time disable dcache for
>> beagle and omap3_evm
> 
> Didn't you fix the issues?
> 
>> and leave it on for mcx and see who has time and
>> hardware to fix things for v2012.10.
> 
> Or we fix it for mcx too until .07 is out ?

To clarify for everyone, the first part of this series fixes some
alignment issues for things that were not starting address aligned.
There still exist end-address alignment issues within ehci-hcd.  The
time I have for this problem right now boils down to disable dcache for
these boards so that USB is still functional.

-- 
Tom