[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] ARM: Update mach-types

[Troy Kisky]

On 3/2/2012 10:45 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 12:00 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Troy Kisky,
>>
>> In message<4F4FFD1F.4080406 at boundarydevices.com>  you wrote:
>>>> Not sure I understand why we have a "machine_ix_xxx()" here. Could you>
>>>> explain?
>>>>
>>>> Amicalement,
>>> Because board/nvidia/seaboard/seaboard.c uses machine_is_ventana but>
>>> that machine is no longer
>>> in mach-types.
>> Then fix the seaboard.c code, please, instead of adding dead code.
> I think that should actually be very easy. Can't the following:
>
> if (machine_is_foo()) {
>      ...
> }
>
> be converted to:
>
> #if CONFIG_MACH_TYPE == MACH_TYPE_FOO
>      ...
> #endif
>
> As a related note, I expect you'll see more and more boards that don't
> exist in the kernel's mach-type.h since people won't register machine
> IDs for boards that only support device tree.
>
How about reversing the test


#if CONFIG_MACH_TYPE == MACH_TYPE_SEABORD

instead of

#if CONFIG_MACH_TYPE == MACH_TYPE_VENTANA

so that I don't care that ventana is no longer defined?


Thanks
Troy