[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] Fix a few warnings that bug me

[Marek Vasut]

Dear Simon Glass,

> Hi Marek,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> > Dear Simon Glass,
> > 
> >> This series fixes some warnings which seem to still be left over from
> >> all the warning-squashing efforts for 2011.12. If patches exist for some
> >> of these already then please ignore.
> >> 
> >> The alias problem in USB is a bit odd, since I thought it was already
> >> fixed. But perhaps it has come back.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Simon Glass (9):
> >>   usb: Fix strict-aliasing warning in host/ohci-hcd.c
> >>   Fix strict-aliasing warning in dlmalloc
> >>   mpc5xxx: Fix strict-aliasing warnings in usb_ohci.c
> >>   ppc4xx: Fix strict-aliasing warnings in usb_ohci.c
> >>   sandbox: sort header files in os.c
> >>   sandbox: Add required header to os.c
> >>   Remove CONFIG_SYS_EXTBDINFO from snapper9260.h
> >>   m68k: Change memsz to a signed char to avoid warning
> >>   ppc: Change memsz variable to signed char
> >> 
> >>  arch/m68k/lib/board.c               |    2 +-
> >>  arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc5xxx/usb_ohci.c |   79
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- arch/powerpc/cpu/ppc4xx/usb_ohci.c  |
> >> 81 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- arch/powerpc/lib/board.c
> >> 
> >> |    7 +--
> >> 
> >>  arch/sandbox/cpu/os.c               |   11 +++--
> >>  common/dlmalloc.c                   |    8 ++--
> >>  drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c         |   26 ++++++------
> >>  include/configs/snapper9260.h       |    1 -
> >>  8 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Can you please split out the USB part and send it to me (I became new usb
> > maint.) please?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance!
> 
> Of course - I think you want to look at this one:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/134600/
> 
> The two PowerPC ones apparently only happen with the 4.4 toolchain, so
> I think we are going to drop those and I am going to upgrade my
> toolchain instead :-)
> 

Can you actually paste the MAKEALL output for those boards where you observe the 
issue please?

I took a look at that patch and I'm not yet completely convinced by the memcpy 
business there. Also, I don't want to pick patches from the middle of a 
patchset, so can you please resend what you consider eligible?

Thanks!

Best regards,
Marek Vasut