[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 03/23] Add abs() macro to return absolute value
Tom Warren
TWarren at nvidia.com
Mon May 7 19:53:46 CEST 2012
Simon,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.u.boot at aribaud.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:28 PM
> To: Simon Glass
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; Tom Warren
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 03/23] Add abs() macro to return absolute
> value
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Le 04/05/2012 20:25, Simon Glass a écrit :
> > This macro is generally useful to make it available in common.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass<sjg at chromium.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Add new patch to put abs() in common.h
> >
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Update x86emu and omap4 to use the abs() macro
> >
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c | 2 --
> > drivers/bios_emulator/x86emu/prim_ops.c | 5 -----
> > include/common.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c
> > index e2189f7..ce3f59c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c
> > @@ -46,8 +46,6 @@
> > #define puts(s)
> > #endif
> >
> > -#define abs(x) (((x)< 0) ? ((x)*-1) : (x))
> > -
> > struct omap4_prcm_regs *const prcm = (struct omap4_prcm_regs
> > *)0x4A004100;
> >
> > const u32 sys_clk_array[8] = {
> > diff --git a/drivers/bios_emulator/x86emu/prim_ops.c
> > b/drivers/bios_emulator/x86emu/prim_ops.c
> > index 7553087..5f6c795 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bios_emulator/x86emu/prim_ops.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bios_emulator/x86emu/prim_ops.c
> > @@ -118,11 +118,6 @@ static u32 x86emu_parity_tab[8] =
> >
> > #define PARITY(x) (((x86emu_parity_tab[(x) / 32]>> ((x) % 32))& 1)
> == 0)
> > #define XOR2(x) (((x) ^ ((x)>>1))& 0x1)
> > -/*----------------------------- Implementation
> > ----------------------------*/ -int abs(int v) -{
> > - return (v>0)?v:-v;
> > -}
> >
> > /*----------------------------- Implementation
> > ----------------------------*/
> >
> > diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/common.h index
> > 74d9704..92eac2c 100644
> > --- a/include/common.h
> > +++ b/include/common.h
> > @@ -229,6 +229,19 @@ ulong timer_get_boot_us(void);
> > #define MIN(x, y) min(x, y)
> > #define MAX(x, y) max(x, y)
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Return the absolute value of a number. This handles unsigned ints,
> > +shorts
> > + * and chars and returns a signed long.
> > + */
>
> What is the rationale for forcing a signed long return type? Such macros as
> max, min, abs etc usually try to avoid any forced typing. Can't you get rid
> of the ret variable and use __x directly as the return value?
> +#define abs(x) ({ \
> > + long ret; \
> > + { \
> > + typeof((x)) __x = (x); \
> > + ret = (__x< 0) ? -__x : __x; \
> > + } \
> > + ret; \
> > + })
> > +
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_EMBEDDED)
> > #define TOTAL_MALLOC_LEN CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN
> > #elif ( ((CONFIG_ENV_ADDR+CONFIG_ENV_SIZE)<
> > CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE) || \
>
This patch is all that's keeping me from submitting a new pull request for u-boot-tegra/master to Albert. I've fixed the other 2 build errors w/your updated patches.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Amicalement,
> --
> Albert.
--
nvpublic
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list