[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] Tegra30: Add CPU (armv7) files

Tom Warren twarren.nvidia at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 22:03:36 CEST 2012


Stephen,

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 04:45 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
>> These files are for code that runs on the CPU (A9) on T30 boards.
>> At this time, it's only the RCM (Recovery Mode) cmd file, which
>> is in tegra-common. As T30-specific run-time code is added, it'll
>> go here.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra30/Makefile
>
>> -LIB  = $(obj)lib$(SOC).o
>> +LIB  =  $(obj)lib$(SOC).o
>
> Looks like there are two spaces after the = there.
>
>> -all: $(obj).depend $(LIB)
>> +all:  $(obj).depend $(LIB)
>
> And a space after the TAB there.

Right on both counts. Despite what git format-patch said about the
origin of this file, it was really copied over from
armv7/tegra20/Makefile, and the spacing errors are in that file
originally. Guess checkpatch doesn't look at Makefiles.

I'll correct this on the next rev. Thanks.

>
> Does U-Boot compile at this point in the series? Hopefully "git bisect"
> is maintained across the series. I suppose there aren't any boards.cfg
> entries for Tegra30 yet, so the fact that e.g. CONFIG_ARCH_DEVICE_TREE
> points at a file that doesn't yet exist is impossible to notice.

I haven't done a git bisect on the series, but I did do individual git
am's on each patch with ./MAKEALL -s tegra20 between each, and saw no
problems when I did the first port. I did go in and rebase/amend a few
commits, though, during a final clean-up effort, so I may have broken
bisect.  I'll be sure to test each patch/bisect on the next rev.

Thanks,

Tom


More information about the U-Boot mailing list