[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] FAT: check for partition 0 not 1 for whole-disk fs

Tom Rini trini at ti.com
Sat Oct 6 01:39:52 CEST 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/05/12 16:36, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/05/2012 05:27 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 10/05/12 16:17, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>> 
>>> The recent switch to use get_device_and_partition() from 
>>> do_fat_ls() broke the ability to access a FAT filesystem 
>>> directly on a whole device; FAT only works within a partition
>>> on a device.
>> 
>>> This change makes e.g. "fatls mmc 0:0" work; explicitly 
>>> requesting partition ID 0 is something that 
>>> get_device_and_partition() fully supports. However, 
>>> fat_register_device() expects partition ID 1 to be used in the 
>>> full-disk case; partition ID 1 was previously implicitly 
>>> specified when the user didn't actually specify a partition
>>> ID. Update fat_register_device() to expect the correct ID.
>> 
>>> This change does imply that if a user explicitly executes
>>> "fatls mmc 0:1" then this will fail, and may be a change in
>>> behaviour.
>> 
>> So wait, you can't list device 0, bus 1 after this patch?
> 
> That's partition 1 not bus 1.

Er yes, thinko there.

> In the context of having a raw FAT filesystem on a device with no 
> partition table, the partition specification "0:1" doesn't work
> before or after this patch; I believe (if it worked at all ever
> before) it was broken by the previous get_device_and_partition()
> rework.
> 
> If you do have a partition table, then "0:1" works just fine 
> with/without this patch.

OK, so the behavior change here, potentially involves 2 partitions
without a partition table?  What is the case where fatls mmc 0:1 would
fail now?

- -- 
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=bUng
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the U-Boot mailing list