[U-Boot] Merging device trees at runtime for module-based systems
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Thu Oct 25 22:46:32 CEST 2012
Dear Daniel,
In message <50893633.6070408 at gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> Overwrites must be addressed in the first place. The most common example
> is that a more generic part (the module tree) registers all details
> about a peripheral up-front but then sets its status to 'disabled'. That
> way, the more specific part (the base board tree) can overwrite this
> property to 'okay' at wish to enable it and not care for the pre-defined
> details. This is also how we do things in our device-trees.
Agreed.
> > I definitely can see the benefit of such a feature and would be happy
> > if you could go forward and implement it.
>
> Ok then. I guess this should be something that can eventually be merged
> back into libfdt?
I can't speak for the FDT custodian, but I think this makes a lot of
sense.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
When the bosses talk about improving productivity, they are never
talking about themselves.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list