[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] Bring in new I2C framework

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:37:08PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:

[snip]
> Later, I wonder whether the concept of a 'current' i2c bus should be
> maintained by the command line interpreter, rather than the i2c
> system. Because to be honest, most of the drivers I see have to save
> the current bus number, set the current bus, do the operation, then
> set the bus back how they found it (to preserve whatever the user
> things is the current bus).

I agree.  Lets move the notion of "current" to cmd_i2c and make
everything internally pass around the bus to operate on.  Or try going
down this path and find a fatal problem :)

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20121026/f80ee320/attachment.pgp>