[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/6] da850/omap-l138: davinci_emac: Suppress auto negotiation if needed

[Bastian.Ruppert at sewerin.de]

Hello,

> Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/6] da850/omap-l138: davinci_emac: Suppress
> auto negotiation if needed
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Prabhakar Lad
> <prabhakar.csengg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Bastian,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Bastian Ruppert
> > <Bastian.Ruppert at sewerin.de> wrote:
> >> From this commit id: b78375a806ed04eb22b963255cfdef8df702de47 auto
> >> negotiation is enabled in RMII mode. Some boards based on da850 need
> >> to suppress this procedure.
> >>
> >> CC: Rajashekhara, Sudhakar <sudhakar.raj at ti.com>
> >> CC: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad at ti.com>
> >> CC: Hadli, Manjunath <manjunath.hadli at ti.com>
> >> CC: sbabic at denx.de
> >> Acked-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>
> >> CC: Tom Rini <trini at ti.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bastian Ruppert <Bastian.Ruppert at Sewerin.de>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/davinci_emac.c |    3 ++-
> >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c b/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c
> >> index b2516d1..fe988d7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c
> >> @@ -897,7 +897,8 @@ int davinci_emac_initialize(void)
> >>         }
> >>
> >>  #if defined(CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC_USE_RMII) && \
> >> -               defined(CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM)
> >> +               defined(CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM) && \
> >> +                       !defined(CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC_RMII_NONEG)
> > instead of CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC_RMII_NONEG why not have
> > CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC_RMII_AUTO_NEGOTIATE ?
>
> Good idea, opt-in is better than opt-out, please make it so.
>

i can see what you mean! But in this case i would like to answer back.
Normally, one almost certainly use the auto negotiation. On the ea20
board there is a seldom case where auto negotiation is counterproductive.
In my opinion the feature "disable it" is opt-in.
So i would like to leave it as it is.

Regards,

Bastian.