[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] Tegra: T30: Add AVP (arm720t) files
Stephen Warren
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Thu Sep 13 22:02:08 CEST 2012
On 09/12/2012 04:10 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
Patch descriptions would be nice.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/cpu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/cpu.c
There's quite a bit of Tegra20-support in this file. Can this file be
shared with Tegra20 rather than forked and enhanced?
> +/* Returns 1 if the current CPU executing is a Cortex-A9, else 0 */
> +int cpu_is_cortexa9(void)
> +{
> + u32 id = readb(NV_PA_PG_UP_BASE + PG_UP_TAG_0);
> + return id == (PG_UP_TAG_0_PID_CPU & 0xff);
> +}
Hmm. Given this is support for the AVP/COP running SPL, shouldn't this
always be true? I thought Allen's SPL patches had cleaned this up.
> +static void enable_cpu_power_rail(void)
> +{
> + struct pmc_ctlr *pmc = (struct pmc_ctlr *)NV_PA_PMC_BASE;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + debug("enable_cpu_power_rail entry\n");
> + reg = readl(&pmc->pmc_cntrl);
> + reg |= CPUPWRREQ_OE;
> + writel(reg, &pmc->pmc_cntrl);
> +
> + /*
> + * Pulse PWRREQ via I2C. We need to find out what this is
> + * doing, tidy up the code and maybe find a better place for it.
> + */
> + tegra_i2c_ll_write_addr(0x005a, 0x0002);
> + tegra_i2c_ll_write_data(0x2328, 0x0a02);
> + udelay(1000);
> + tegra_i2c_ll_write_data(0x0127, 0x0a02);
> + udelay(10 * 1000);
Those functions access the DVC I2C controller's register space, so
presumably they're doing I2C accesses. Not all boards use the same PMIC,
so it seems like we really do need to factor this out.
> + /*
> + * The TI PMU65861C needs a 3.75ms delay between enabling
> + * the power rail and enabling the CPU clock. This delay
> + * between SM1EN and SM1 is for switching time + the ramp
> + * up of the voltage to the CPU (VDD_CPU from PMU). We use 0xf00 as
> + * is is ARM-friendly (can fit in a single ARMv4T mov immmediate
> + * instruction).
> + */
> + udelay(3840);
The Cardhu board at least does not use the TPS65861. At the very least
the comment isn't quite right. Is this code needed?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/spl.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/spl.c
> +void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
> +{
> + board_init_uart_f();
> +
> + /* Initialize periph GPIOs */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_UART_SWITCH
> + gpio_early_init_uart();
> +#else
> + gpio_config_uart();
> +#endif
Didn't we have patches to get rid of that mess and just use the same
function consistently across all boards, or was that only discussed and
never actually implemented?
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list