[U-Boot] QE firmware/microcode handling
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Sep 20 20:24:27 CEST 2012
On 09/20/2012 10:22:21 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > following up Timur's patch on QE microcode:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=132197537730440&w=2
> >
> > I was wondering, would it make any sense to *embed* QE's firmware
> within
> > u-boot image itself?
>
> There are three problems:
>
> 1) A lot of U-Boot images are already very close to the 512KB limit.
> We
> often have to disable features in U-Boot to get it to build
> properly. An
> additional 64KB would be prohibitive.
The 512K limit is arbitrary and can be changed. It exists just to
provide a stable start address on something that grows from the end of
flash.
> 2) The firmware license is not exactly GPL-compatible. The firmware
> files
> themselves are freely distributable, but the source code is closed.
> I'm
> not sure how that would work in a GPL U-Boot.
>
> 3) For Fman, at least, we often update the firmware after the board
> ships,
> which means you would need to update U-Boot to get a new firmware.
> So no
> one might actually use this feature because they're afraid they won't
> be
> able to update the firmware.
>
> If you can do it, go ahead. I would approve a patch that adds the
> ability
> to inject a firmware binary into u-boot.bin, provided it's controlled
> via
> a build or CONFIG_SYS_xxx option.
CONFIG_xxx. CONFIG_SYS_xxx options are supposed to describe hardware,
and CONFIG_xxx options are supposed to be software config.
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list