[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: lacie_kw: add support for WIRELESS_SPACE

Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot at aribaud.net
Sat Sep 22 10:51:51 CEST 2012


Hi Simon,

On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:16:21 +0200, Simon Guinot
<simon.guinot at sequanux.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:16:40AM -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-
> > > bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Albert ARIBAUD
> > > Sent: 18 August 2012 02:59
> > > To: Tom Rini
> > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: lacie_kw: add support for
> > > WIRELESS_SPACE
> > > 
> > > Hi Tom,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:55:38 -0700, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 08:08:34PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net>
> > > > [snip]
> > > > > @@ -90,8 +100,14 @@
> > > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_IDE_MAXDEVICE        1
> > > > >  #if defined(CONFIG_NET2BIG_V2)
> > > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT		"2big2> "
> > > > > -#else
> > > > > +#elif defined(CONFIG_NETSPACE_V2)
> > > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT		"ns2> "
> > > > > +#elif defined(CONFIG_INETSPACE_V2)
> > > > > +#define CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT		"is2> "
> > > > > +#elif defined(CONFIG_WIRELESS_SPACE)
> > > > > +#define CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT		"ws> "
> > > > > +#else
> > > > > +#define CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT		"lacie-kw> "
> > > >
> > > > Is this really a good thing?  Over here I've been trying /
> > > > hoping to get everyone to just use 'U-Boot # ' as the prompt as
> > > > this makes automated testing easier and there's other run-time
> > > > ways to see what we're on.
> > 
> > I personally vote to have common boot prompt 'U-boot #'.
> > 
> > > 
> > > I quite like prompts that identify the board I'm on, but it's not
> > > a must either. Cc:ing Simon in cas his own patches re lacie_kw
> > > would be impacted by your suggestion.
> > 
> > Well, we can expose a command to detect/print the board info, if
> > needed.
> 
> The run-time command "version" already returns both the system and the
> machine informations. This command can be used for testing purposes.
> IMHO the only requirement for an U-Boot prompt is to be short enough.
> Everything else is a matter of taste. Mine goes for the machine name.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Simon

Tom,

Can automated test cope with a general prompt of the form '.*#' ?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list