[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Convert p1_p2_rdb_pc to new spl

Tom Rini trini at ti.com
Mon Sep 24 21:06:55 CEST 2012


On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:50:07PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/21/2012 07:13:24 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:10PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >
> >> This is based on a merge of top-of-tree plus the 85xx tree and
> >the spl
> >> framework branch (it doesn't use the SPL framework code because
> >of size
> >> constraints, but I wanted to make sure there were no conflicts
> >with it).
> >>
> >> Tested on P2020RDB-PC_NAND and P1021RDB-PC_36BIT_NAND.
> >
> >How close (or far) is this from using the framework due to size?
> >And I
> >will give the whole series a proper read and comment Monday.
> 
> Configuring for P2020RDB-PC_NAND - Board: p1_p2_rdb_pc, Options:
> P2020RDB,NAND
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>  393179	  31912	 267088	 692179	  a8fd3	/tmp/u-boot//u-boot
>    3612	    388	      0	   4000	    fa0	/tmp/u-boot//spl/u-boot-spl
> 
> --------------------- SUMMARY ----------------------------
> Boards compiled: 1
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Size limit is 4096 bytes.

Right.  But that's with your changes yes?  Do you have the how-much for
using the common framework was?  Or just going (and I agree, it won't
fit today) by the 96 bytes to spare that a new framework won't fit?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20120924/9325fc35/attachment.pgp>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list