[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/6] tegra: Add NAND flash support

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Thu Sep 27 19:23:18 CEST 2012


Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 09/21/2012 03:44 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
>> Simon,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: sjg at google.com [mailto:sjg at google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
>>> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:33 PM
>>> To: Tom Warren
>>> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; Stephen Warren; Scott Wood; Marek Vasut
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] tegra: Add NAND flash support
>>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Tom Warren <TWarren at nvidia.com> wrote:
>>>> Simon,
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Simon Glass [mailto:sjg at chromium.org]
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 11:53 PM
>>>>> To: U-Boot Mailing List
>>>>> Cc: Tom Warren; Stephen Warren; Scott Wood; Simon Glass
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH v4 0/6] tegra: Add NAND flash support
>>>>>
>>>>> This series adds NAND flash support to Tegra and enables it on Seaboard.
>>>>
>>>> Applied to u-boot-tegra/next, thanks. The fix for the m28evk and
>>> apx4devkit builds (moving common.h to the top in mxs_nand.c) can come from
>>> you or Marek, and I'll add it to /next later. But for now, all tegra20
>>> boards build fine.
>>>
>>> OK thanks.
>>>
>>> With LCD I had a few comments, but the main question is with the bindings.
>>> Can we get a resolution there?
>>
>> Sorry, missed this question in the flurry of Tegra30 patches I've been working on.
>>
>> What exactly do you need? Can we start a discussion offline w/Stephen & whomever else you need to get this resolved and moving forward again? It's the only thing left hanging for Tegra20.
>
> The issue is making sure that the kernel and U-Boot use the exact same
> DT binding.
>
> The main people to work with here are:
>
> Thierry Reding (Avionic Design) and Mark Zhang (NVIDIA) who're working
> on the tegradrm driver for the Linux kernel.
>
> I believe Thierry is close to publishing an updated version of tegradrm
> which would presumably be a good base.
>
> You probably also want to look at:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-July/024875.html

Yes that's where I got the binding that I am currently using. I think
Thierry pointed me to it a while ago.

>
> ... although I think that's implicitly included in the tegradrm stuff.

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list