[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 2/4] mpc83xx: add support for mpc8309

Kim Phillips kim.phillips at freescale.com
Fri Sep 28 17:51:58 CEST 2012


On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:08:39 +0200
Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto at keymile.com> wrote:

> On 09/28/2012 01:18 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:21:19 +0200
> > Gerlando Falauto<gerlando.falauto at keymile.com>  wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> [...]
> > so far the 8308 and the 8360 are the only SoCs that don't have a
> > 'tens'/MPC83Xx defines.  The 8360 can get away with it, since it's
> > very close to the 8358 (and we can avoid that marketing-imposed
> > snafu).  The 8308 and 9 are more different (QE vs TSEC), but as seen
> > here, there are other commonalities.
> 
> I personally don't think adding a new 830x symbol would lead to that 
> much saving. Plus it should be the last one of the series so there won't 
> be much use in the future either.
> So unless you think that's absolutely necessary, I'd submit a v2 without 
> this.

I must be missing something - wouldn't it benefit things like
SCCR_USBDRCM for the 8308, which is still being actively developed?

Kim



More information about the U-Boot mailing list