[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: add w1c interrupt status support

[Marek Vasut]

On Thursday, December 19, 2013 at 08:10:05 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote:
> 2013/12/19 Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>:
> > On Thursday, December 19, 2013 at 01:54:56 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote:
> >> 2013/12/18 Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>:
> >> > On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 at 08:24:48 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote:
> >> >> From: Kuo-Jung Su <dantesu at faraday-tech.com>
> >> >> 
> >> >> Since hardware revision 1.11.0, the following interrupt status
> >> >> registers
> >> > 
> >> >> are now write-1-clear (w1c):
> >> > What did they look like before ?
> >> 
> >> They were r/w registers. i.e., software must write a zero to clear the
> >> status. I'll add the comment in next version.
> > 
> > OK.
> > 
> >> >> 1. Interrupt Source Group 0 Register (0x144) (EP0 Abort: BIT5)
> >> >> 2. Interrupt Source Group 2 Register (0x14C) (All bits)
> >> >> 
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Kuo-Jung Su <dantesu at faraday-tech.com>
> >> >> CC: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> 
> >> >>  drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c |   10 ++++++++--
> >> >>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >> 
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c
> >> >> b/drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c index 6e19db1..e3a61cc 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/fotg210.c
> >> >> @@ -847,8 +847,11 @@ int usb_gadget_handle_interrupts(void)
> >> >> 
> >> >>       /* CX interrupts */
> >> >>       if (gisr & GISR_GRP0) {
> >> >>       
> >> >>               st = readl(&regs->gisr0);
> >> >> 
> >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_FOTG210_ISRW1C
> >> > 
> >> > Can we not get rid of this ifdef somehow please ? Like detect the
> >> > revision on- the-fly and handle the bit accordingly or such ?
> >> 
> >> Unfortunately there is no revision id register in this hardware, so I
> >> have to do it manually.
> > 
> > So what would happen if you write 1, then write 0 into them ? ;-) Won't
> > that handle both cases? Writing one will make sure the clean them on new
> > hardware, writing zero afterwards will clean them on old hardware.
> 
> Good idea! I think it should work just fine.
> I'll make sure if does work, and then prepare for the new patch.

Thanks :)

Best regards,
Marek Vasut