[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/7] ARM: extend non-secure switch to also go into HYP mode

[Andre Przywara]

On 06/28/2013 05:51 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Andre
>
>
> [RFC]
>
> I'd like to suggest to separate HYP-switching code
> from Non-secure switching.

Thanks for stepping up and providing a use-case!
The first version of the patches had those two separate cases, but I
later merged them in favor of readability.
So I actually split those two cases in the code now and am about to fold 
this in the existing patches.

> And define different macros, for example:
>
> CONFIG_ARMV7_NONSECURE : switch to nonsecure
> CONFIG_ARMV7_VIRT      : switch to hypervisor

done.

>
> Of cource, CONFIG_ARMV7_NONSECURE must be defined
> when using CONFIG_ARMV7_VIRT.
>
> (If we introduced Kconfig to U-boot,
> we could handle nicely dependency between CONFIGs.)

I managed to get along without it. By clever use of ifdefs this 
dependency is now implicitly in the code.

I still have to test this, so the new version will be delayed a bit.

Thanks!
Andre.

>
> I know your incentive to switch to non-secure state
> is virtualization.
> But I think this separation would make this code
> useful for other boards and easy to understand.
>
> For example (this situtation might be specific
> to my board), non-secure switching is done
> for the reason to use a hardware debugger,
> because our debugger without security extension
> can work only in non-secure state.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
>
>