[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 09/12] mmc: omap_hsmmc: add mmc1 pbias, ldo1
Tom Rini
trini at ti.com
Wed Jun 5 15:45:55 CEST 2013
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 11:03:26AM +0300, Lubomir Popov wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 05/06/13 00:06, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:58:27PM +0300, Lubomir Popov wrote:
> >> Hi Lokesh,
> >>
> >>> Hi Lubomir,
> >>> On Thursday 30 May 2013 07:56 PM, Lubomir Popov wrote:
> >>>> Hi Lokesh,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 30/05/13 16:19, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> >>>>> From: Balaji T K <balajitk at ti.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> add dra mmc pbias support and ldo1 power on
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk at ti.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla at ti.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/omap.h | 3 ++-
> >>>>> drivers/mmc/omap_hsmmc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> >>>>> drivers/power/palmas.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>> include/configs/omap5_common.h | 4 ++++
> >>>>> include/configs/omap5_uevm.h | 5 -----
> >>>>> include/palmas.h | 6 +++++-
> >>>>> 6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >> [snip]
> >>>>> + /* set LDO9 TWL6035 to 3V */
> >>>> LDO9? TWL6035? If this function is used on the DRA7xx boards only (with
> >>>> TPS659038), you should add some comment above.
> >>> Ok ll add the comment.
> >>>>
> >>>>> + val = 0x2b; /* (3 - 0.9) * 20 + 1 */
> >>>> Why not use definitions for the voltage? You could take them from
> >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244103/ where some values are
> >>>> defined.
> >>> Yes, Ill rebase this patch on top of your patch and use those defines.
> >> Please be aware that my above mentioned patch has not been reviewed/
> >> tested/acked/nacked/whatever by nobody (except possibly a quick look by
> >> Nishanth Menon, who had some objections). I wrote it when bringing up a
> >> custom OMAP5 board, and most probably it shall not go into mainline in
> >> its current form, if ever. I gave it only as an example of how things
> >> could be done cleaner. Feel free to use the code as you wish, but I'm
> >> afraid that applying it as a patch to your tree and basing upon it might
> >> run you into problems when you later sync with mainline.
> >>
> >> Tom, your opinion?
> >
> > OK, so at the time it was "nothing will really use this code except test
> > functions". Looks like we have a use for mmc1_ldo9 code at least, so
> > lets rework the first patch for adding that + cleanups wrt constants.
> Well, I'm not quite sure that this LDO9 function would be the only one
> used (or LDO1 on the DRA7xx board). Judging from omapboot for the OMAP5
> boards for example, SMPS7 (it delivers the common 1.8 V I/O supply) is
> set to 'Forced PWM' mode in order to reduce board noise - there sure has
> been a reason to do so and sacrifice converter efficiency. Therefore I
> added similar functionality in my patch to the Palmas driver (and am
> explicitly calling it in my board init).
> The option to bypass LDO9 on OMAP5+TWL603x boards seems quite mandatory
> as well, if hardware is designed such that the SD card socket has a
> separate fixed 3.3 V supply which also powers the LDO9 input (the
> uEVM for example). On the DRA7xx+TPS659038 board the power scheme is
> different and this does not apply.
OK, lets see. That so lets keep your patch as-is, since we've now got
-ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections/--gc-sections on ARM for main
U-Boot, these small things won't hurt like they used to.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130605/d7a6cda4/attachment.pgp>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list