[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 12/12] Add verified boot information and test

Tom Rini trini at ti.com
Thu Jun 20 18:07:18 CEST 2013


On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 03:33:19PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> > Add a description of how to implement verified boot using signed FIT
> > images,
> > and a simple test which verifies operation on sandbox.
> >
> > The test signs a FIT image and verifies it, then signs a FIT configuration
> > and verifies it. Then it corrupts the signature to check that this is
> > detected.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >
> 
> If it helps, here are the results of my build for this series (and the
> trace one). No new failures but you can see quite a few problems with
> Xscale.

I _think_ Xscale is toolchain choice related.  My question is, for
arches which use --gc-sections, what is the size change from before to
after, when not opting in on this?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130620/72b50def/attachment.pgp>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list