[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:56:34AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 03/13/2013 09:35 AM, Beno??t Th??baudeau wrote:
> > Hi Stefano,
> > 
> > On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:01:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> On 08/03/2013 15:54, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> I think the giant list from Benoit got lost.  It's a HUGE
> >>>> thing to change.  I think we should just accept that config
> >>>> variables are mixed case, or at least not block this patch on
> >>>> a very large unrelated fixup.
> >>> 
> >>> Agreed. Benoit's patch series contains 30 patches and it is at
> >>> version 9.
> >>> 
> >>> It would be better to treat this fixup seperately.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Agree with you, this is my proposal to go on. I think we can also
> >> try to split patches for area of competence, with patchsets for
> >> i.MX, for ARM and for general. And maybe merging patches that are
> >> laready passed the review.
> >> 
> >> For that, patches 1 until 9 are related to i.MX and mainly to the
> >> NAND for i.MX. They get already Scott's ACK. IMHO they are
> >> independent from the rest of the patchset and they can be merged
> >> now. My proposal is that I merge this part and for the next
> >> iteration the number of patches will be reduced ;-)
> >> 
> >>> Currently mx31pdk is broken in mainline and Benoit's series
> >>> fixes it, so hopefully this can make into 2013.04.
> >> 
> >> Let's see what we can do ;-)
> > 
> > Yes, it could be split as you suggest, but it has already been
> > reviewed and tested by several people, so I'm not sure if we still
> > have to wait for anything before applying. Albert seemed to agree
> > for this v9 for the arm bits, but he has not given his formal ack
> > yet. Albert, is everything OK for you?
> > 
> > The sooner it is applied, the longer people will have to test
> > before the release.
> 
> I am not going to insist that the N different parts come in from N
> different trees, as long as the relevant acks are present (and it
> sounds like they are).  I will give the whole series another read
> today just to be sure there's nothing popping out at me.

I've given everything a read-over and nothing jumps out at me.  I also
threw it (with a few imx things failing so I skipped) onto master and
built and booted my am335x_evm with it, so for the series:

Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini at ti.com>

And if Albert is happy, I'm happy to see it all come via u-boot-arm.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130313/75953996/attachment.pgp>