[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Tom,

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:12:32 -0400, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:56:34AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On 03/13/2013 09:35 AM, Beno??t Th??baudeau wrote:
> > > Hi Stefano,
> > > 
> > > On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:01:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > >> On 08/03/2013 15:54, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> 
> > >>>> I think the giant list from Benoit got lost.  It's a HUGE
> > >>>> thing to change.  I think we should just accept that config
> > >>>> variables are mixed case, or at least not block this patch on
> > >>>> a very large unrelated fixup.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Agreed. Benoit's patch series contains 30 patches and it is at
> > >>> version 9.
> > >>> 
> > >>> It would be better to treat this fixup seperately.
> > >>> 
> > >> 
> > >> Agree with you, this is my proposal to go on. I think we can also
> > >> try to split patches for area of competence, with patchsets for
> > >> i.MX, for ARM and for general. And maybe merging patches that are
> > >> laready passed the review.
> > >> 
> > >> For that, patches 1 until 9 are related to i.MX and mainly to the
> > >> NAND for i.MX. They get already Scott's ACK. IMHO they are
> > >> independent from the rest of the patchset and they can be merged
> > >> now. My proposal is that I merge this part and for the next
> > >> iteration the number of patches will be reduced ;-)
> > >> 
> > >>> Currently mx31pdk is broken in mainline and Benoit's series
> > >>> fixes it, so hopefully this can make into 2013.04.
> > >> 
> > >> Let's see what we can do ;-)
> > > 
> > > Yes, it could be split as you suggest, but it has already been
> > > reviewed and tested by several people, so I'm not sure if we still
> > > have to wait for anything before applying. Albert seemed to agree
> > > for this v9 for the arm bits, but he has not given his formal ack
> > > yet. Albert, is everything OK for you?
> > > 
> > > The sooner it is applied, the longer people will have to test
> > > before the release.
> > 
> > I am not going to insist that the N different parts come in from N
> > different trees, as long as the relevant acks are present (and it
> > sounds like they are).  I will give the whole series another read
> > today just to be sure there's nothing popping out at me.
> 
> I've given everything a read-over and nothing jumps out at me.  I also
> threw it (with a few imx things failing so I skipped) onto master and
> built and booted my am335x_evm with it, so for the series:
> 
> Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini at ti.com>
> 
> And if Albert is happy, I'm happy to see it all come via u-boot-arm.

As soon as ARM is back in sync with mainline, I'll start looking
into pulling this in.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.