[U-Boot] Patches for this merge window
Tom Rini
trini at ti.com
Wed Mar 20 20:28:32 CET 2013
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:09:29PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
> [take 2, sorry]
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> I see quite a lot of non-x86 patches in my todo list - does that mean
> that I should pick them up if I am happy with them, or just assign
> them back to you once I've taken a look?
>
> I'm keen to get the sandbox fs and memory stuff in fairly early if
> possible, since I fear breakages and the longer people have to test
> the better. No one has screamed about map_sysmem() but I'm not sure if
> anyone noticed. So I could pull these in, build and send a pull if
> that suits? Perhaps one series at a time.... Also if Mike is having a
> break should I pull in the SPI ones assigned to me?
>
> There is also buildman, and I'm not sure what to do about that. It
> would be nice to have some feedback if people have tried it - I have
> had a few private emails only. I think it's a great help, but it still
> has some rough edges.
Looking back at this, I think only buildman is left. Did all of the
other patman related changes get submitted cleanly? I think the answer
is we'll take in buildman now so it's easier to get folks to try it in
their workflows and see where it takes us.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130320/f32cfe09/attachment.pgp>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list