[U-Boot] [PATCH] Separate EBV Socrates board from Altera Cyclone 5 board

[Michal Simek]

On 11/12/2013 03:46 PM, Chin Liang See wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 11:17 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 11/12/2013 10:56 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>>> On 11/11/2013 09:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:26:02PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Altera Cyclone 5 board is very different board (big, rectangular,
>>>>>> expensive) than EBV Socrates (small, circular, cheap) board. Different
>>>>>> parts are used there, too, but same configuration of u-boot works on
>>>>>> both. Nevertheless, printing wrong name confuses users.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Therefore this splits the configuration so that u-boot knows they are
>>>>>> different. So far it is only used for correcting the puts, but there
>>>>>> may be other uses in future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel at denx.de>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any way at run time to tell which board we are on?
>>>>
>>>> Why do you care about board name in general?
>>>
>>> We care for board names for a very long time in U-Boot and I'd like to
>>> keep this.  I actually expect a sensible board name on any platform that
>>> I touch.  The board name is an important extra information additional to
>>> the SoC name.  So the question is the other way round - since when do we
>>> _not_ care about board names?
>>
>> There could be i2c memory on board where you can find out this information but that's
>> problematic if it is empty or you want to use this i2c for something else.
>> For all microblaze boards I use XILINX_BOARD_NAME which reflects hw design
>> (if user is smart enough board name is the part of hw design name).
>> For zynq/socfpga sensible solution is probably to load this name for DTS.
>>
> 
> Currently, the SOCFPGA SPL is customized through a set of handoff files
> which located at board folders. These handoff files are generated by
> tools based on board and user design in FPGA. With that, not much
> decision being made during run time based on the board. With this
> handoff and tools approach, it will shield off the complexity of
> hardware configuration and errors (if user change it manually without
> tools help). Thanks

Which nice copy of our approach. :-)
But anyway I believe that you are also generating one macro which define
name of this configuration based on hw design/board you are using.
And then you can use this macro for showing board/design name in u-boot.

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20131112/d533c8bd/attachment.pgp>