[U-Boot] [PATCH] include: define bool type in a more portable way
Masahiro Yamada
yamada.m at jp.panasonic.com
Tue Nov 19 05:37:17 CET 2013
Hi.
I posted v2 of this patch
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/292258/
I think both of two solutions work.
(1) include <stdbool.h> in common/cmd_test.c
but undef true and false.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/292247/
(2) Do not include <stdbool.h> and
define true and false with enum.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/292258/
Personally, I prefer (2) to (1) because
- we don't need to tweak common/cmd_test.c any more
- we can reduce the conflict if we have a plan to update
Linux-originated header files.
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list