[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6: Add IOMUX_CONFIG_SION flag to all GPIO pins

Eric Nelson eric.nelson at boundarydevices.com
Tue Oct 1 16:21:28 CEST 2013


On 10/01/2013 06:08 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>> Dear Otavio Salvador,
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de> wrote:
>>>> Hi Otavio,
>>>>
>>>> On 30/09/2013 00:15, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>>> The IOMUX_CONFIG_SION allows for reading PAD value from PSR register.
>>>>>
>>>>> The following quote from the datasheet:
>>>>>
>>>>> ,----
>>>>>
>>>>> | ...
>>>>> | 28.4.2.2 GPIO Write Mode
>>>>> | The programming sequence for driving output signals should be as
>>>>> | follows: 1. Configure IOMUX to select GPIO mode (Via IOMUXC), also
>>>>> | enable SION if need to read loopback pad value through PSR
>>>>> | 2. Configure GPIO direction register to output (GPIO_GDIR[GDIR] set to
>>>>> | 1b). 3. Write value to data register (GPIO_DR).
>>>>> | ...
>>>>>
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>> This fixes the gpio_get_value to properly work when a GPIO is set for
>>>>> output and has no conflicts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for Benoît Thébaudeau <benoit.thebaudeau at advansee.com>, Fabio
>>>>> Estevam <fabio.estevam at freescale.com> and Eric Bénard
>>>>> <eric at eukrea.com> for helping to properly trace this down.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> I come later in the discussion, but I see you all have found the
>>>> solution ;-).
>>>>
>>>> I suggest you add in the commit message that this patch is only for
>>>> i.MX6 (if you do not plan to extend it to the other i.MXes...), so that
>>>> we can track that the same must be done also for the other SOCs.
>>>
>>> I think this is clear from the commit prefix.
>>
>> The commit message should be ARM: mx6: or such btw.
>>
>> It'd be nice to fix it up for MX5 as well so we're consistent.
>
> Benoit expressed some doubt if it can be assumed to behave the same
> for all i.MX that's why I didn't apply it for all. I cannot look at
> this, at this moment, so I prefer to not change it without checking
> the datasheet for it.
>

The same behaviour is present on i.MX51 and i.MX53.



More information about the U-Boot mailing list