[U-Boot] [PATCH] env_mmc: fix buffer allocation for armv7
Tom Rini
trini at ti.com
Sun Oct 6 22:42:14 CEST 2013
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 09:57:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
> In message <20131004170203.GL15917 at bill-the-cat> you wrote:
> >
> > I really don't like this. We're now allocating for example 256KiB on
> > the stack, rather than malloc. I posted a patch recently to convert the
> > non-redundant case to malloc instead for this reason. I believe the
> > answer is we need to be using memalign here, like
> > common/bouncebuf.c::bounce_buffer_start does. Can you do this? If not,
> > can you test a patch? Thanks.
>
> What exactly don't you like in using the stack for temporary data
> buffers? That's what it has been invented for. Using malloc() is
> only useful when the allocated buffers neet to be kept across file
> scope, which appears not to be the case here.
>
> For file scope buffers, usign the satck is the most efficient and
> preferred approach - it's fast and results in minimal (virtually no)
> code.
>
> Why do you hesitate to use the stack?
Mainly to allow us to work in restricted stack areas like SPL where we
simply may not have that much space available.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20131006/c2026da9/attachment.pgp>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list