[U-Boot] Pull request for u-boot-marvell.git

[Holger Brunck]

On 10/07/2013 02:58 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.brunck at keymile.com]
>> Sent: 07 October 2013 12:48
>> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
>> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD; 'u-boot at lists.denx.de'; Manas
>> Saksena
>> Subject: Re: Pull request for u-boot-marvell.git
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/02/2013 02:51 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Hi Prafulla,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 04:20:24 -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar
>>> <prafulla at marvell.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Albert,
>>>> Please kindly pull
>>>> The following changes since commit
>> 12eba1b49380988fd87cc0b3af44014cca8b71c4:
>>>>   Jeroen Hofstee (1):
>>>>         README: update ARM register usage
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>   u-boot-marvell.git master branch.
>>>>
>>>> Holger Brunck (2):
>>>>       arm/km: drop unneeded define
>>>>       arm/km: make local function startup_allowed
>> static
>>>>
>>>> Karlheinz Jerg (1):
>>>>       arm/km: add support for km_kirkwood_128m16
>> board
>>>>
>>>>  board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c |    6 +-----
>>>>  boards.cfg                    |    1 +
>>>>  include/configs/km_kirkwood.h |   10 ++++++++++
>>>>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Regards...
>>>> Prafulla . . .
>>>
>>> For km_kirkwood_128m16:
>>>
>>> ../common/ivm.c: In function 'ivm_read_eeprom':
>>> ../common/ivm.c:304:18: error: 'CONFIG_KM_IVM_BUS'
>> undeclared (first
>>> use in this function) ../common/ivm.c:304:18: note:
>> each undeclared
>>> identifier is reported only once for each function it
>> appears in
>>> make[1]: ***
>>> [/home/albert/src/u-boot-
>> arm/build/km_kirkwood_128m16/board/keymile/km_arm/../co
>> mmon/ivm.o]
>>> Error 1 make: ***
>>> [/home/albert/src/u-boot-
>> arm/build/km_kirkwood_128m16/board/keymile/km_arm/libkm
>> _arm.o]
>>> Error 2
>>
>> ok there is some interdependency with Heikos i2c mux
>> rework.
>>
>> Prafulla should I send a patch on top of your branch
>> which fixes this or should
>> I send a v3 of the whole patch?
> 
> Please send the patch to fix this issue on the top of branch.
> 

done three days ago. So could you please pick it up and send Albert a new pull
request?

Thanks!
Holger