[U-Boot] Pull request: nand flash
Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.boot at aribaud.net
Fri Oct 11 09:11:52 CEST 2013
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:52:57 -0400, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/10/2013 06:10 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:18 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On 10/10/2013 03:00 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:52:14 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
> >>> <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Tom,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:45:17 -0400, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>>>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10/10/2013 04:12 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Tom,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 21:45:25 -0400, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:29:55PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sorry for the lateness, but here are some MTD/UBI bugfixes. They've
> >>>>>>>> been acked by Stefan Roese.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The following changes since commit b770e88a6c2548727f0d57a3e9e8bb0830f977b5:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Fix number base handling of "load" command (2013-10-07 15:54:18 -0400)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash.git master
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to cc734f5ab26134e5e8d57c34edc257c89ac5b1d2:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> cmd_ubi: add write.part command, to write a volume in multiple parts (2013-10-09 12:52:22 -0500)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> Paul Burton (4):
> >>>>>>>> mtd: driver _read() returns max_bitflips; mtd_read() returns -EUCLEAN
> >>>>>>>> cmd_mtdparts: use 64 bits for flash size, partition size & offset
> >>>>>>>> cmd_ubi: use int64_t volume size for 'ubi create'
> >>>>>>>> cmd_ubi: add write.part command, to write a volume in multiple parts
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> OK, problem:
> >>>>>>> Author: Paul Burton <paul.burton at imgtec.com>
> >>>>>>> Date: Wed Sep 4 15:16:57 2013 +0100
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> cmd_mtdparts: use 64 bits for flash size, partition size & offset
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Causes a number of platform such as am3517_crane to fail to build with
> >>>>>>> recent toolchains with errors such as:
> >>>>>>> /opt/linaro/gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.7-2013.03-20130313_linux/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd:
> >>>>>>> error:
> >>>>>>> /opt/linaro/gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf-4.7-2013.03-20130313_linux/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.7.3/libgcc.a(bpabi.o)
> >>>>>>> uses VFP register arguments, u-boot does not
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Which we need to sort out, one way or another. Albert, any quick ideas?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Builds OK on my side, both nand-flash/master and a merge of nf/master
> >>>>>> and u-boot/master, with gcc version 4.7.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-1ubuntu1)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tom, can you specify which toolchain shows the issue?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Both ELDK 5.3 and Linaro 2013.03 (one TI has picked for some things) do
> >>>>> the above. ELDK 5.2 is OK
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll test with ELDK5.3 in about an hour.
> >>>
> >>> I've installed eldk-eglibc-i686-arm-toolchain-gmae-5.3.sh and can build
> >>> am3517_crane on both nand-flash/master as well as on a merge of
> >>> u-boot/master and nand-flash/master
> >>
> >> Here we go, armhf toolchains trigger this problem because, I suspect, we
> >> aren't enforcing a flag to say "no, really, no hfp here" or similar.
> >
> > Any idea why this patchset triggers it? Does the 64-bit stuff cause
> > something from libgcc to be used that previously wasn't? There is some
> > open-coded 64-bit division, but it's by a power of two so GCC should
> > convert it to a shift (and the ability to do 64-bit shifts was already
> > required by print_size()).
>
> I'm not sure what parts of this math exactly cause things to go all
> nutty, but I suspect the answer is that we should be enforcing
> - -msomething or another than hf defaults to using (un)setting.
Ok, trying with the ARMhf toolchain.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list