[U-Boot] declaring and initializing variables
York Sun
yorksun at freescale.com
Mon Oct 14 21:05:52 CEST 2013
On 10/07/2013 03:03 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:04:33 -0700
> York Sun <yorksun at freescale.com> wrote:
>
>> Kim, et al.,
>>
>> I know I have asked this before. Pardon me as I don't consider myself a
>> savy programmer.
>>
>> I am cleaning up the DDR driver for mpc83xx, mpc85xx and mpc86xx. The
>> question is the accetable formats of declaring and initializing variable
>> at the same time. The variables are the ccsr register pointers. I have
>> two formats here
>>
>> struct ccsr_ddr __iomem *ddr = (void *) CONFIG_FOO_ADDR;
>> struct ccsr_ddr __iomem *ddr =
>> (struct ccsr_ddr __iomem *) CONFIG_FOO_ADDR;
>>
>> You have told me the second format is preferred. I have been using this
>> format since. But in practice, the second format is often too long and I
>> have to wrap to next line. It's not a problem for new code. As I am
>> trying to cleanup the existing code, I would have to make more changes.
>> So I am back to this question. Is the first format (using void *)
>> accetable in long term?
>
> you're not running sparse, are you? :)
>
> Use 'make C=1' or 'MAKEALL -C' when building u-boot.
>
I see what you mean. We have so many issue with existing code. Is it
practical to enforce?
York
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list