[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] i2c, omap24xx: convert driver to new mutlibus/mutliadapter framework

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Igor,

Am 29.10.2013 12:07, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
> On 10/28/13 08:19, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Hello Igor,
>>
>> Am 27.10.2013 08:30, schrieb Igor Grinberg:
>>> Hi Heiko,
>>>
>>> On 10/22/13 11:03, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>>> - add omap24xx driver to new multibus/multiadpater support
>>>> - adapted all config files, which uses this driver
>>>>
>>>> Tested on the am335x based siemens boards rut, dxr2 and pxm2
>>>> posted here:
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/263211/
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher<hs at denx.de>
>>>> Tested-by: Tom Rini<trini at ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Lars Poeschel<poeschel at lemonage.de>
>>>> Cc: Steve Sakoman<sakoman at gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Weber<weber at corscience.de>
>>>> Cc: Tom Rix<Tom.Rix at windriver.com>
>>>> Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas<notasas at gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra<eballetbo at iseebcn.com>
>>>> Cc: Luca Ceresoli<luca.ceresoli at comelit.it>
>>>> Cc: Igor Grinberg<grinberg at compulab.co.il>
>>>> Cc: Ilya Yanok<yanok at emcraft.com>
>>>> Cc: Stefano Babic<sbabic at denx.de>
>>>> Cc: Nishanth Menon<nm at ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Pali Rohár<pali.rohar at gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Peter Barada<peter.barada at logicpd.com>
>>>> Cc: Nagendra T S<nagendra at mistralsolutions.com>
>>>> Cc: Michael Jones<michael.jones at matrix-vision.de>
>>>> Cc: Raphael Assenat<raph at 8d.com>
>>>
>>> [...]
>> [...]
>>
>>>> diff --git a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h
>>>> index 02ffbb1..a07559d 100644
>>>> --- a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h
>>>> +++ b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h
>>>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
>>>>    #ifndef _EEPROM_
>>>>    #define _EEPROM_
>>>>
>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DRIVER_OMAP34XX_I2C
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_OMAP34XX
>>>>    int cm_t3x_eeprom_read_mac_addr(uchar *buf);
>>>>    u32 cm_t3x_eeprom_get_board_rev(void);
>>>>    #else
>>>
>>> Please, rebase on top of:
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275284/
>>> which should be applied any time soon.
>>>
>>> Otherwise,
>>> Acked-by: Igor Grinberg<grinberg at compulab.co.il>
>>
>> Hmm.. I cannot see, that your patch is accepted ... but I looked in it,
>> and it looks good to me. So, I propose to add this patch to the i2c tree,
>> so I do the necessary changes in my patch when applying it to the
>> i2c tree (as they are trivial changes) ...
>
> Well, I have no problem with that, but we need to take into account
> that there are several more patches (unrelated to i2c) on the mailing
> list waiting for approval/apply and depend on my series.

Ok.

>> @Tom: Is this OK for you?
>
> I think, it would be better to apply my series to u-boot-ti and you can
> pull from it to the i2c tree?

Hmm.. u-boot-i2c is based on u-boot.git not on u-boot-ti, and I did
not want to change this. I can of course rebase my patch against u-boot-ti
when Tom added your patch to u-boot-ti and resend it, and tom pick up my
patch ...

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany