[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 6/6] mtd: nand: omap_gpmc: minor cleanup of omap_correct_data_bch

[Stefan Roese]

On 10.04.2014 11:35, Pekon Gupta wrote:
> This patch tries to avoid some local pointer dereferences, by using common
> local variables in omap_correct_data_bch()
>
> Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pekon at ti.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c | 12 ++++++------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c
> index ae541c2..a96f310 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static int omap_correct_data_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
>   {
>   	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
>   	struct omap_nand_info	*info = chip->priv;
> -	uint32_t eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
> +	struct nand_ecc_ctrl	*ecc = &chip->ecc;

Again, nitpicking because of inconsistent indentation.

>   	uint32_t error_count = 0, error_max;
>   	uint32_t error_loc[8];
>   	enum bch_level bch_type;
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int omap_correct_data_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
>   	uint32_t byte_pos, bit_pos;
>
>   	/* check calculated ecc */
> -	for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.bytes && !ecc_flag; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ecc->bytes && !ecc_flag; i++) {
>   		if (calc_ecc[i] != 0x00)
>   			ecc_flag = 1;
>   	}
> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static int omap_correct_data_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
>
>   	/* check for whether its a erased-page */
>   	ecc_flag = 0;
> -	for (i = 0; i < chip->ecc.bytes && !ecc_flag; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ecc->bytes && !ecc_flag; i++) {
>   		if (read_ecc[i] != 0xff)
>   			ecc_flag = 1;
>   	}
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static int omap_correct_data_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
>   	switch (info->ecc_scheme) {
>   	case OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW:
>   		bch_type = BCH_8_BIT;
> -		omap_reverse_list(calc_ecc, eccbytes - 1);
> +		omap_reverse_list(calc_ecc, ecc->bytes - 1);
>   		break;
>   	default:
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -372,14 +372,14 @@ static int omap_correct_data_bch(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *dat,
>   	elm_config(bch_type);
>   	if (elm_check_error(calc_ecc, bch_type, &error_count, error_loc)) {
>   		printf("nand: error: uncorrectable ECC errors\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		return -EBADMSG;

This change is not mentioned in the commit log. Is it intentional? Or 
should it be moved to a separate patch?

Thanks,
Stefan