[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6slevk: Add SPI NOR flash support
Jagan Teki
jagannadh.teki at gmail.com
Sat Apr 12 19:50:35 CEST 2014
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> On Saturday, April 12, 2014 at 12:30:51 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at freescale.com>
>> >
>> > mx6slevk has a m25p32 SPI NOR flash connected to ESCSPI port.
>> >
>> > Add support for it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at freescale.com>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6sl_pins.h | 4 ++++
>> > board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> > include/configs/mx6slevk.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>> > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6sl_pins.h
>> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6sl_pins.h index 5f9c90a..045ccc4
>> > 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6sl_pins.h
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6sl_pins.h
>> > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
>> >
>> > #include <asm/imx-common/iomux-v3.h>
>> >
>> > enum {
>> >
>> > + MX6_PAD_ECSPI1_MISO__ECSPI_MISO =
>> > IOMUX_PAD(0x0358, 0x0068, 0, 0x0684, 0, 0), +
>> > MX6_PAD_ECSPI1_MOSI__ECSPI_MOSI =
>> > IOMUX_PAD(0x035C, 0x006C, 0, 0x0688, 0, 0), +
>> > MX6_PAD_ECSPI1_SCLK__ECSPI_SCLK =
>> > IOMUX_PAD(0x0360, 0x0070, 0, 0x067C, 0, 0), +
>> > MX6_PAD_ECSPI1_SS0__GPIO4_IO11 =
>> > IOMUX_PAD(0x0364, 0x0074, 5, 0x0000, 0, 0),
>> >
>> > MX6_PAD_SD2_CLK__USDHC2_CLK =
>> > IOMUX_PAD(0x055C, 0x0254, 0, 0x0000, 0, 0),
>> > MX6_PAD_SD2_CMD__USDHC2_CMD =
>> > IOMUX_PAD(0x0560, 0x0258, 0, 0x0000, 0, 0),
>> > MX6_PAD_SD2_DAT0__USDHC2_DAT0 =
>> > IOMUX_PAD(0x0564, 0x025C, 0, 0x0000, 0, 0),
>> >
>> > diff --git a/board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c
>> > b/board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c index aadad32..d2b64cc 100644
>> > --- a/board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c
>> > +++ b/board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c
>> > @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>> >
>> > PAD_CTL_PUS_100K_UP | PAD_CTL_SPEED_MED | \
>> > PAD_CTL_DSE_40ohm | PAD_CTL_HYS)
>> >
>> > +#define SPI_PAD_CTRL (PAD_CTL_HYS | PAD_CTL_SPEED_MED | \
>> > + PAD_CTL_DSE_40ohm | PAD_CTL_SRE_FAST)
>> > +
>> >
>> > #define ETH_PHY_RESET IMX_GPIO_NR(4, 21)
>> >
>> > int dram_init(void)
>> >
>> > @@ -71,6 +74,20 @@ static iomux_v3_cfg_t const fec_pads[] = {
>> >
>> > MX6_PAD_FEC_TX_CLK__GPIO_4_21 | MUX_PAD_CTRL(NO_PAD_CTRL),
>> >
>> > };
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MXC_SPI
>> > +static iomux_v3_cfg_t ecspi1_pads[] = {
>> > + MX6_PAD_ECSPI1_MISO__ECSPI_MISO | MUX_PAD_CTRL(SPI_PAD_CTRL),
>> > + MX6_PAD_ECSPI1_MOSI__ECSPI_MOSI | MUX_PAD_CTRL(SPI_PAD_CTRL),
>> > + MX6_PAD_ECSPI1_SCLK__ECSPI_SCLK | MUX_PAD_CTRL(SPI_PAD_CTRL),
>> > + MX6_PAD_ECSPI1_SS0__GPIO4_IO11 | MUX_PAD_CTRL(NO_PAD_CTRL),
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static void setup_spi(void)
>> > +{
>> > + imx_iomux_v3_setup_multiple_pads(ecspi1_pads,
>> > ARRAY_SIZE(ecspi1_pads)); +}
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> >
>> > static void setup_iomux_uart(void)
>> > {
>> >
>> > imx_iomux_v3_setup_multiple_pads(uart1_pads,
>> > ARRAY_SIZE(uart1_pads));
>> >
>> > @@ -132,6 +149,9 @@ static int setup_fec(void)
>> >
>> > int board_early_init_f(void)
>> > {
>> >
>> > setup_iomux_uart();
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MXC_SPI
>> > + setup_spi();
>> > +#endif
>> >
>> > return 0;
>> >
>> > }
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/configs/mx6slevk.h b/include/configs/mx6slevk.h
>> > index 1876dbf..3d05a64 100644
>> > --- a/include/configs/mx6slevk.h
>> > +++ b/include/configs/mx6slevk.h
>> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>> >
>> > #define __CONFIG_H
>> >
>> > #include <asm/arch/imx-regs.h>
>> >
>> > +#include <asm/imx-common/gpio.h>
>> >
>> > #include <linux/sizes.h>
>> > #include "mx6_common.h"
>> >
>> > @@ -196,4 +197,15 @@
>> >
>> > #define CONFIG_CMD_CACHE
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > +#define CONFIG_CMD_SF
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_SF
>> > +#define CONFIG_SPI_FLASH
>> > +#define CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO
>> > +#define CONFIG_MXC_SPI
>> > +#define CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_BUS 0
>>
>> *no_need* to define DEFAULT_BUS as 0 - it's default.
>
> We better be explicit here.
*explicit* fine - don't you think defining a default value may
increase extra macro which looks *duplicate*
thanks!
--
Jagan.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list