[U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11] IMX: add additional function for pinmux using an array

[Tim Harvey]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Nikita Kiryanov <nikita at compulab.co.il> wrote:
> On 04/09/2014 06:40 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Nikita Kiryanov <nikita at compulab.co.il>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Tim,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/03/2014 09:01 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Add new function that can take an array of iomux configs, an index, and
>>>> a stride to allow a multi-dimentional array of pinmux values to be used
>>>> to define pinmux values per cpu-type.
>>>>
>>>> This takes a different approach to previously proposed solutions which
>>>> used
>>>> multiple arrays of pad lists. The goal is to eliminate having these
>>>> multiple
>>>> arrays such as 'mx6q_uart1_pads' and 'mx6dl_uart1_pads' which are almost
>>>> identical copies of each other except for the MX6Q/MX6DL prefix on the
>>>> PAD.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I like this approach, but I think you should also define the IOMUX,
>>> SETUP_PAD, and SETUP_PADS macros from patch 10 in this file, as they
>>> (macros and function) are clearly meant to be used together.
>>>
>>
>> I agree with this. Do the macro names IOMUX, SETUP_PAD, SETUP_PADS make
>> sense?
>>
>
> My suggestion would be MX6QDL_DDR_IOMUX, MX6QDL_DDR_SETUP_PADS, and
> MX6QDL_SETUP_PAD (this last one is not DDR specific).
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Nikita.

Stefano,

You mentioned in another thread you had some remarks about my pinmux
proposal here? I'm anxious to post a v2 patch and keep this ball
rolling.

Thanks,

Tim