[U-Boot] [PATCH 00/25] x86: Add Intel Queensbay platform support

Bin Meng bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Fri Dec 5 15:22:49 CET 2014


Hi Simon,

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 5 December 2014 at 07:07, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Bin,
>> >
>> > On 4 December 2014 at 08:00, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> This patch series add the Intel Queensbay platform support. The Queensbay
>> >> platform includes an Atom E6xx processor (codename Tunnel Creek) and a
>> >> Platform Controller Hub EG20T (codename Topcliff). The support depends
>> >> on Intel Firmware Support Package (FSP) to initialize the processor and
>> >> chipset including system memory. With this patch series, U-Boot boots to
>> >> Linux kernel. Validated on an Intel Crown Bay board with kernel 3.17.
>> >>
>> >> Note I did not clean up the original FSP codes released by Intel with
>> >> U-Boot coding convention. So there will be coding style issues reported
>> >> by the patch checkers against patch#11 and #12 in this series.
>> >
>> > I've acked some of this - let me know if you would like me to apply
>> > things out of order, etc. Otherwise I'll wait.
>>
>> Thanks for acking/reviewing them so quickly! Let me rework and send
>> the v2 patch series so that you can apply them one-time.
>
> OK sounds good. Can we clarify the code style side of things? Since it
> is a binary blob I don't feel like we are stuck with the Intel code
> style. We could using existing U-Boot types, change the mixed case
> stuff and tidy up comment style.
>
> For fsp_support.c the code doesn't look all that tidy.
>

Yes, I will update the code style in the FSP codes to use U-Boot style.

Regards,
Bin


More information about the U-Boot mailing list