[U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use full tftpboot command instead of shortcut tftp

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Michal,

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:45:16 +0100, Michal Simek <monstr at monstr.eu>
wrote:

> Hi Albert,
> 
> On 02/10/2014 10:36 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> > 
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:30:37 +0100, Michal Simek <monstr at monstr.eu>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Albert,
> >>
> >> On 02/10/2014 10:11 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >>> Hi Michal,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed,  5 Feb 2014 07:56:07 +0100, Michal Simek
> >>> <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The reason is enabling tftpput command where
> >>>> tftp shorcut stops to work for tftpboot.
> >>>
> >>> Do you think you could extend this patch to all config files where
> >>> the 'tftp' shortcut exists? This would prevent future issues on
> >>> targets other than Zynq and hopefully it is only a matter of grepping /
> >>> sed'ing through include/configs/*.h.
> >>
> >> Based on my experience it is better to use full commands in variables
> >> but on the other hand I have met with the case when adding these 4 chars
> >> caused that max variable size has been exceed with error.
> > 
> >> It means for short variables I can't see any problem with it
> >> and definitely will be better to use full command names instead of shortcut.
> > 
> > Extending to "short variables" only is fine with me -- I'm not asking
> > you to re-engineer config header files, only to perform a cheap and
> > useful search-and-replace.
> 
> Let's wait for others what they think and separate this from this patch
> because there is one more patch depends on this which you can see in my
> pull request.
> I think we shouldn't limit this just to include/configs/*.h
> but also to all READMEs and comments.

Ok, so a separate patch. Fine with me -- this answers my question re
your PR.

> Thanks,
> Michal

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.