[U-Boot] [PATCH] driver/mxc_i2c: Move static data structure to global_data
Tom Rini
trini at ti.com
Mon Feb 10 23:45:58 CET 2014
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:28:01PM -0800, York Sun wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 02:10 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:02:52PM -0800, York Sun wrote:
> >
> >> This driver needs a data structure in SRAM before SDRAM is available.
> >> This is not alway the case using .data section. Moving this data
> >> structure to global_data guarantees it is writable.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun at freescale.com>
> >> CC: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky at boundarydevices.com>
> >
> > If you need something in SRAM then you need to place it in that section,
> > see arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/u-boot-spl.lds for example
> >
>
> I am not sure if it is a similar situation. But anyway, I am open to
> suggestions.
>
> For this driver, the variable needs to be writable. I guess it wasn't
> a problem for existing platforms which probably call this driver after
> relocation.
>
> Does the SRAM code/data relocate to SDRAM? I don't want this variable
> to stay in SRAM once u-boot relocates to normal memory.
So in this case the problem is still within SPL right? You would put
the parts you need to have in SRAM during SPL and DDR in full U-Boot
with __attribute__((section(".data.srdata"))) and in the SoC's linker
scripts make sure that drivers/i2c/built-in.o(.data.srdata) ends up in
the appropriate place for each case.
I say all of this as I think we really want to avoid expanding on
gd->arch-> stuff if we can (which reminds me, your patch expands on main
gd not gd->arch so NAK on that either way).
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140210/b2991018/attachment.pgp>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list