[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] mtd: nand: omap: fix ecclayout->oobfree->offset
Gupta, Pekon
pekon at ti.com
Mon Feb 17 08:49:13 CET 2014
removing stable at vger.kernel.org from CC list.
(git send-email --suppress-cc=cc din't work for me)
>From: Gupta, Pekon
>
>1) In current implementation, ecclayout->oobfree->offset is calculated with
> respect to ecclayout->eccpos[0] which is incorrect because ECC bytes may not
> be stored contiguously in OOB.
> So, this patch calculates ecclayout->oobfree->offset with respect to last
> ECC byte-position 'eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes-1]'.
>
>2) ECC layout of some ecc-schemes expects reserved-markers at specific eccpos[]
> which should not be over-written by any file-system metadata.
> So this patch aligns oobfree->offset taking into account of such markers.
>
>CC: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # 3.13.x+
>Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo at gmail.com>
>Tested-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
>Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pekon at ti.com>
>---
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>index 34ef941..58685ab 100644
>--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
>@@ -1832,8 +1832,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> oob_index = 1;
> for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
> ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
>- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
>- ecclayout->eccbytes;
>+ /* no reserved-marker in ecclayout for this ecc-scheme */
>+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset =
>+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
> break;
>
> case OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW:
>@@ -1856,8 +1857,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (((i + 1) % nand_chip->ecc.bytes) == 0)
> oob_index++;
> }
>- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
>- ecclayout->eccbytes;
>+ /* include reserved-marker in ecclayout->oobfree calculation */
>+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset = 1 +
>+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
> /* software bch library is used for locating errors */
> nand_chip->ecc.priv = nand_bch_init(mtd,
> nand_chip->ecc.size,
>@@ -1894,8 +1896,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> oob_index = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
> for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
> ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
>- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
>- ecclayout->eccbytes;
>+ /* reserved marker already included in ecclayout->eccbytes */
>+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset =
>+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
> /* This ECC scheme requires ELM H/W block */
> if (is_elm_present(info, pdata->elm_of_node, BCH4_ECC) < 0) {
> pr_err("nand: error: could not initialize ELM\n");
>@@ -1929,8 +1932,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (((i + 1) % nand_chip->ecc.bytes) == 0)
> oob_index++;
> }
>- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
>- ecclayout->eccbytes;
>+ /* include reserved-marker in ecclayout->oobfree calculation */
>+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset = 1 +
>+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
> /* software bch library is used for locating errors */
> nand_chip->ecc.priv = nand_bch_init(mtd,
> nand_chip->ecc.size,
>@@ -1974,8 +1978,9 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> oob_index = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
> for (i = 0; i < ecclayout->eccbytes; i++, oob_index++)
> ecclayout->eccpos[i] = oob_index;
>- ecclayout->oobfree->offset = ecclayout->eccpos[0] +
>- ecclayout->eccbytes;
>+ /* reserved marker already included in ecclayout->eccbytes */
>+ ecclayout->oobfree->offset =
>+ ecclayout->eccpos[ecclayout->eccbytes - 1] + 1;
> break;
> #else
> pr_err("nand: error: CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_BCH not enabled\n");
>--
>1.8.5.1.163.gd7aced9
With regards, pekon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list