[U-Boot] [PATCH] socfpga: Add a signing tool that automatically signs the preloader.
Charles Manning
cdhmanning at gmail.com
Thu Feb 20 01:58:19 CET 2014
Hi Tom
On Thursday 20 February 2014 13:32:37 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:01:40PM +1300, Charles Manning wrote:
> > No need to use the altera tool any more...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charles Manning <cdhmanning at gmail.com>
>
> [snip]
>
> > + //crcval = crc_calc ((uint32_t *)buf, len/4);
> > + printf("crc %x\n", crcval);
>
> Debug stuff left in?
>
> > +static char *out_filename = "";
> > +
> > +
> > +
> > +static void bad_exit(const char *str)
>
> Extra spaces.
Thanks for the feedback.
I will fix those and resubmit.
>
> Finally, we can't do this as an extension of mkimage? We do other
> headers with that already, does it really not fit that model? Thanks!
I looked at doing a mkimage integration, but is this really the way to go in
all cases?
The signed image does not really apply a header as such. It mashes in
a "header" at position 0x40 and then appends a checksum at the end, then pads
the file out to 64k.
The final file is:
* 64 bytes of executable (interrupt vector table)
* "header"
* more code
*crc32
*padding with 0x00 to 64k.
Adding it to mkimage and "cooking" the binary was not too hard. I could not
figure out how to extend the size of the buffer and pad it out to 64k. I'm
sure I could figure that out... it's just software..
If it really **must** be part of mkimage, I'll do that.
If so, what mkimage operation need to be supported?
Changing type makes no sense (apart from signing a binary). There are no
uboot-format header/marker or anything. Verification probably makes sense,
but that's it.
Thoughts??
-- Charles
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list