[U-Boot] [U-Boot, v3, 1/3] dts: re-write dts/Makefile more simply with Kbuild
Masahiro Yamada
yamada.m at jp.panasonic.com
Thu Feb 20 10:30:44 CET 2014
Hello Tom, Simon,
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:11:11 -0500
Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:28:25AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> > Useful rules in scripts/Makefile.lib allows us to easily
> > generate a device tree blob and wrap it in assembly code.
> >
> > We do not need to parse a linker script to get output format and arch.
> >
> > This commit deletes ./u-boot.dtb since it is a copy of dts/dt.dtb.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m at jp.panasonic.com>
>
> Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
>
> --
> Tom
Ditto.
Possibly it was missed because Simon and I were discussing
in version 2 thread.
> > >
> > > Besides, dts/dt.dtb is a prerequisite of dts/dt.dtb.S
> > > when CONFIG_OF_EMBED is enabled.
> > >
> > > I believe keeping dts/dt.dtb is reasonable enough.
> > >
> > > Better to keep both?
> >
> > Yes I think so.
>
>
> OK.
> I will revive ./u-boot.dtb and post a new version.
>
> And I will send it as a single patch
> dropping 2/3 and 3/3.
> Do you think it's better?
>
> Many kbuild-related patches are being stuck on patchwork
> and my local branch is getting messed up.
> I don't want to delay this patch any more.
I was planning to post a new version.
But before that, version 3 was applied.
So, what should I do?
Shall I post a follow-up patch to revive a
device tree at the top directory (./u-boot.dtb) ?
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list