[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: ehci: exynos: set/reset hsic phys
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Sat Jan 4 08:16:24 CET 2014
On Friday, January 03, 2014 at 06:03:47 AM, Inderpal Singh wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 3 January 2014 06:24, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 02, 2014 at 10:41:58 AM, Inderpal Singh wrote:
> > > From: Inderpal Singh <chander.kashyap at linaro.org>
> > >
> > > The controller has 3 ports. The port0 is for USB 2.0 Phy, port1 and
> > > port2 are for HSIC phys. The usb 2.0 phy is already being setup. This
> > > patch sets up the hsic phys.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh at linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/ehci.h | 14 +++++++++++
> > > drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 39
> > >
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >
> > Is it OK to set all the ports up unconditionally ? I am not sure about
> > exynos of
> > course, but is it possible there are some machines which don't use the
> > HSIC ports and this would have some kind of adverse effects on those?
>
> I feel it should not cause any side effect as it wont interfere with the
> normal USB 2.0 phy port. Also, its being done along the same lines as
> kernel driver at drivers/usb/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c, which also sets up all
> ports unconditionally.
OK, I won't fight this. I would be much more inclined to being able to
conditionally select which ports get configured. Especially, since you do know
that information from DT, dont you?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list