[U-Boot] Pull request for u-boot-arm -> u-boot?

[Stephen Warren]

On 05/05/2014 11:59 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> Albert,
>>
>> I was wondering when the next pull request for u-boot-arm/master ->
>> u-boot/master was likely to be?
>>
>> I asked because some changes to the Tegra USB driver went through the
>> u-boot-tegra/master and hence are now in u-boot-arm/master, but not in
>> u-boot-usb/master. I have some more USB driver changes which rely on the
>> earlier USB patches, and these should really go through
>> u-boot-usb/master rather than the Tegra/ARM tree. For this to happen,
>> u-boot-usb/master needs to contain the patches currently in
>> u-boot-arm/master, and the best way for that to happen is for those
>> patches to get into u-boot/master so that u-boot-usb/master can merge them.
>>
>> Or, should Marek just merge u-boot-arm/master into his tree directly?
> 
> Or should we have a 'u-boot-next' tree using the same concept as the
> kernel 'linux-next'?

Having a u-boot-next won't solve this particular problem in any way.

Having a u-boot-next allows any end-developer to develop on top of the
combined code in all trees, thus detecting/avoiding any conflicts with them.

However, my issue above is that a patch that's already applied in tree A
needs to make its way into tree B, so that further patches can be
*applied* in tree B. This is all about applying patches, not developing
patches. The existence (or not) of a u-boot-next tree doesn't affect
this issue at all.