[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] x86: Add quick TSC calibration via PIT
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Tue Nov 4 15:58:32 CET 2014
Use the same way that Linux does for quick TSC calibration via PIT
when calibration via MSR fails.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/i8254.h | 3 +
arch/x86/lib/tsc_timer.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 158 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8254.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8254.h
index c3ccd4f..4116de1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8254.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8254.h
@@ -36,4 +36,7 @@
#define PIT_CMD_MODE4 0x08 /* Select mode 4 */
#define PIT_CMD_MODE5 0x0A /* Select mode 5 */
+/* The clock frequency of the i8253/i8254 PIT */
+#define PIT_TICK_RATE 1193182ul
+
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/tsc_timer.c b/arch/x86/lib/tsc_timer.c
index fafbbfc..8a0abde 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/tsc_timer.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/tsc_timer.c
@@ -117,6 +117,157 @@ fail:
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * This reads the current MSB of the PIT counter, and
+ * checks if we are running on sufficiently fast and
+ * non-virtualized hardware.
+ *
+ * Our expectations are:
+ *
+ * - the PIT is running at roughly 1.19MHz
+ *
+ * - each IO is going to take about 1us on real hardware,
+ * but we allow it to be much faster (by a factor of 10) or
+ * _slightly_ slower (ie we allow up to a 2us read+counter
+ * update - anything else implies a unacceptably slow CPU
+ * or PIT for the fast calibration to work.
+ *
+ * - with 256 PIT ticks to read the value, we have 214us to
+ * see the same MSB (and overhead like doing a single TSC
+ * read per MSB value etc).
+ *
+ * - We're doing 2 reads per loop (LSB, MSB), and we expect
+ * them each to take about a microsecond on real hardware.
+ * So we expect a count value of around 100. But we'll be
+ * generous, and accept anything over 50.
+ *
+ * - if the PIT is stuck, and we see *many* more reads, we
+ * return early (and the next caller of pit_expect_msb()
+ * then consider it a failure when they don't see the
+ * next expected value).
+ *
+ * These expectations mean that we know that we have seen the
+ * transition from one expected value to another with a fairly
+ * high accuracy, and we didn't miss any events. We can thus
+ * use the TSC value at the transitions to calculate a pretty
+ * good value for the TSC frequencty.
+ */
+static inline int pit_verify_msb(unsigned char val)
+{
+ /* Ignore LSB */
+ inb(0x42);
+ return inb(0x42) == val;
+}
+
+static inline int pit_expect_msb(unsigned char val, u64 *tscp, unsigned long *deltap)
+{
+ int count;
+ u64 tsc = 0, prev_tsc = 0;
+
+ for (count = 0; count < 50000; count++) {
+ if (!pit_verify_msb(val))
+ break;
+ prev_tsc = tsc;
+ tsc = rdtsc();
+ }
+ *deltap = rdtsc() - prev_tsc;
+ *tscp = tsc;
+
+ /*
+ * We require _some_ success, but the quality control
+ * will be based on the error terms on the TSC values.
+ */
+ return count > 5;
+}
+
+/*
+ * How many MSB values do we want to see? We aim for
+ * a maximum error rate of 500ppm (in practice the
+ * real error is much smaller), but refuse to spend
+ * more than 50ms on it.
+ */
+#define MAX_QUICK_PIT_MS 50
+#define MAX_QUICK_PIT_ITERATIONS (MAX_QUICK_PIT_MS * PIT_TICK_RATE / 1000 / 256)
+
+static unsigned long quick_pit_calibrate(void)
+{
+ int i;
+ u64 tsc, delta;
+ unsigned long d1, d2;
+
+ /* Set the Gate high, disable speaker */
+ outb((inb(0x61) & ~0x02) | 0x01, 0x61);
+
+ /*
+ * Counter 2, mode 0 (one-shot), binary count
+ *
+ * NOTE! Mode 2 decrements by two (and then the
+ * output is flipped each time, giving the same
+ * final output frequency as a decrement-by-one),
+ * so mode 0 is much better when looking at the
+ * individual counts.
+ */
+ outb(0xb0, 0x43);
+
+ /* Start at 0xffff */
+ outb(0xff, 0x42);
+ outb(0xff, 0x42);
+
+ /*
+ * The PIT starts counting at the next edge, so we
+ * need to delay for a microsecond. The easiest way
+ * to do that is to just read back the 16-bit counter
+ * once from the PIT.
+ */
+ pit_verify_msb(0);
+
+ if (pit_expect_msb(0xff, &tsc, &d1)) {
+ for (i = 1; i <= MAX_QUICK_PIT_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+ if (!pit_expect_msb(0xff-i, &delta, &d2))
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * Iterate until the error is less than 500 ppm
+ */
+ delta -= tsc;
+ if (d1+d2 >= delta >> 11)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * Check the PIT one more time to verify that
+ * all TSC reads were stable wrt the PIT.
+ *
+ * This also guarantees serialization of the
+ * last cycle read ('d2') in pit_expect_msb.
+ */
+ if (!pit_verify_msb(0xfe - i))
+ break;
+ goto success;
+ }
+ }
+ debug("Fast TSC calibration failed\n");
+ return 0;
+
+success:
+ /*
+ * Ok, if we get here, then we've seen the
+ * MSB of the PIT decrement 'i' times, and the
+ * error has shrunk to less than 500 ppm.
+ *
+ * As a result, we can depend on there not being
+ * any odd delays anywhere, and the TSC reads are
+ * reliable (within the error).
+ *
+ * kHz = ticks / time-in-seconds / 1000;
+ * kHz = (t2 - t1) / (I * 256 / PIT_TICK_RATE) / 1000
+ * kHz = ((t2 - t1) * PIT_TICK_RATE) / (I * 256 * 1000)
+ */
+ delta *= PIT_TICK_RATE;
+ delta /= (i*256*1000);
+ debug("Fast TSC calibration using PIT\n");
+ return delta / 1000;
+}
+
void timer_set_base(u64 base)
{
gd->arch.tsc_base = base;
@@ -143,6 +294,10 @@ unsigned __attribute__((no_instrument_function)) long get_tbclk_mhz(void)
unsigned long fast_calibrate;
fast_calibrate = try_msr_calibrate_tsc();
+ if (fast_calibrate)
+ return fast_calibrate;
+
+ fast_calibrate = quick_pit_calibrate();
if (!fast_calibrate)
panic("TSC frequency is ZERO");
--
1.8.2.1
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list