[U-Boot] [PATCH 22/39] x86: Move Coreboot PCI into common cpu area

Bin Meng bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Fri Nov 7 03:12:09 CET 2014


Hi Simon,

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
>
> On 6 November 2014 18:39, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Bin,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6 November 2014 17:07, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>>> -static struct pci_config_table pci_coreboot_config_table[] = {
>>>>> +static struct pci_config_table pci_x86_config_table[] = {
>>>>>         /* vendor, device, class, bus, dev, func */
>>>>>         { PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI,
>>>>>                 PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, &config_pci_bridge },
>>>>> @@ -33,17 +33,19 @@ static struct pci_config_table pci_coreboot_config_table[] = {
>>>>
>>>> Use this config_table will cause infinite loop when doing
>>>> pci_hose_scan later. I do not use config_table on my Crown Bay port,
>>>> instead using CONFIG_PCI_PNP which works very well.
>>>
>>> OK, so are you saying that we should leave this separate for each board?
>>
>> Not really. But we can make this code really generic. So far it is broken.
>
> I think the issue is that booting from Coreboot is quite a different
> use case from everything else.

We can use #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT in avoid re-allocating memory
resources in U-Boot.

>>>>>  void pci_init_board(void)
>>>>>  {
>>>>> -       coreboot_hose.config_table = pci_coreboot_config_table;
>>>>> -       coreboot_hose.first_busno = 0;
>>>>> -       coreboot_hose.last_busno = 0;
>>>>> +       struct pci_controller *hose = &x86_hose;
>>>>>
>>>>> -       pci_set_region(coreboot_hose.regions + 0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xffffffff,
>>>>> -               PCI_REGION_MEM);
>>>>> -       coreboot_hose.region_count = 1;
>>>>> +       hose->config_table = pci_x86_config_table;
>>>>> +       hose->first_busno = 0;
>>>>> +       hose->last_busno = 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> -       pci_setup_type1(&coreboot_hose);
>>>>> +       pci_set_region(hose->regions + 0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xffffffff,
>>>>> +                      PCI_REGION_MEM);
>>>>> +       hose->region_count = 1;
>>>>
>>>> There are 3 issues with the pci_set_region here:
>>>> 1). The whole 4GiB PCI memory region creats conflicts with the systeam
>>>> RAM memory map. This is a programming effor and normally causes
>>>> undefined behaviour from chipset perspective.
>>>> 2). There is no IO region configured, that means any device behind the
>>>> PCI/PCIe bridge with only IO bar will fail to work.
>>>> 3). There is no systeam RAM region configured, that means any device
>>>> driver behind the PCI/PCIe bridge will fail to create pci addr <-> cpu
>>>> physical addr mappings.
>>>
>>> Actually this is not real setup - for the coreboot case it is
>>> scan-only, there is no memory or I/O allocation going on.
>>
>> OK, so if U-Boot boots from coreboot, the issue #1 and #2 disappear
>> because coreboot has already enumerated the buses and devices and have
>> memory/io allocation setup. That's fine. But this code is assumed to
>> be used in U-Boot without coreboot too, thus U-Boot has to do the same
>> thing as coreboot. And in the latter case, issue #1 and #2 do matter.
>> About the issue #3, even when U-Boot is booting from coreboot, the
>> system RAM region still needs to be set up otherwise you won't get any
>> PCI device driver in U-Boot work. You can try adding CONFIG_E1000 to
>> test an Intel Pro/1000 NIC in U-Boot and see what's happening.
>
> If I do that, then Coreboot will find the device and allocate space
> for it, then U-Boot will juts use the allocated space.

Yes, I understand this.

> Actually I think the region is completely misleading in the Coreboot
> case and should juts be remove.

I am not sure if memory and IO can be removed completely for the
coreboot case. I will need look into the pci.c/pci_auto.c and PCI
device driver to confirm.

> Issue 3 is not a problem either I think, since again Coreboot will allocate it.

No, it does matter for coreboot. If the pci hose does not have the
system RAM region setup, the pci_mem_to_phys will fail when PCI device
driver wants to do DMA to RAM.

Regards,
Bin


More information about the U-Boot mailing list